After taking a short hiatus and trying to clear my head from
a long series of fashion weeks, I thought it only fitting to “muse” on the
topic or maybe offer some observations and maybe it is to proffer a litany of suggestions
for the next grueling cycle. So read up and let me know what you think….
Aside from the ungodly duration of what was once referred to
as collection, there is now an extra
added element of torture. Collections used
to focus on the top tier of designers who showed in the so called 4 major
fashion capitals but alas that has changed dramatically. In today’s world of
fashion we have supposedly become more democratic and less snobbish which
translates to anyone who can pay the tariff gains entree into a once rarefied
world.
Shows varied from city to city in terms of production,
stature and size and yes they were always regarded as a rite of passage as
having “arrived.” Well, that is all changed as we now have such an extreme
homogenization that a “buyer,” if there are any left, a press person, or any
attendee of the cycle might have trouble knowing exactly where they are! Models
are robots, the staging is one at a time for the most part and all the clothes
seem to just blend together.
Complicating matters even further is that the once rarefied
air of collections is breathed by every classification of designers, whether
they are at the designer or couture level or at the contemporary level. No
matter what strata of so called design that they hail from, the clothes look
the same with very rare exception. We have designers who are of the “me too”
variety and then we have designers who will do anything to project themselves
as “modern” or relevant and lastly we have intellectual designers who need to
pass out press releases or as I call then instruction booklets beforehand as to
explain or as I see it to justify the collections that they present.
Gone are the days when clothes spoke for themselves. Today
we seem to have “critics” who spend more than half their verbiage speaking to
the venue and the haughty inspirations of the so called intelligentsia of
designers and a lot less time speaking to what they have seen. Once again in
most cases, read one review you have read them all. Apparently now that big business
has crept its way into hallowed halls of “high fashion” one can’t help but get
the feeling that reviews are bought and paid for by advertising dollars. If
that is not enough, then consider than if Conde Nast, which now controls a good
part of what used to be referred to as genuine fashion media, is not your ally, well,
then you are on the outskirts of the new inner circle.
Where we once had characters such as Hebe Dorsey, Bernadine
Morris, Mr. Fairchild, Mr. Coady and a host of
other reality based critics or reviewers, we now get Suzy Latkes, Shooting Blanks, Feeble Phelps,
Cate Horny, Nuclear Winter and car loads of 20 and 30 somethings who give equally non informative reviews of what
is paraded in front of them. Gone are the reviews which actually opined about
the collection. Gone are words like ugly, distasteful, monstrosities, jokes,
disasters and many such adjectives and nouns that pejoratively spoke about
deserving collections. Today we have general bland accountings and only raves
are reserved for the so called pets.
Oddly, those raves never really speak of clothes but speak around the
clothes providing useless information that is supposedly the justification for
usually ugly and ungodly creations that should have been panned rather than lauded.
The system is broken. We have the SEC which supposedly
controls big business which SUPPOSEDLY prevents monopolies and yet we have a
monopoly or series of monopolies at work here in the fashion business. Whether
in media, or ownership of design houses or in retail, we are ruled and subject
to the whims of the very few. We have lost what made this business exciting and
vibrant. We are devolving instead of evolving and most sadly is what we have
lost so much creativity due the search for acceptance.
As Grace Coddington said “I liked it better when fashion
came first!”
No comments:
Post a Comment