Showing posts with label fashion by rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fashion by rules. Show all posts
Thursday, December 22, 2016
the FASHIONABLE reads of 2016
A good book should leave you... slightly exhausted at the end. You live several lives while reading it....Find a book and read it soon !!!
www.nyjournalofbooks.com/reviewer/jeffrey-felner
Labels:
books,
fashion,
fashion by rules,
jeffrey felner,
learning. education,
time travel
Monday, June 27, 2016
meet Filep Motwary the tsunami of fashion
The man is
as fluent in his words as he prodigious with his photography; Filep Motwary is
a tsunami within the fashion world. Although the name may not be on the tip of
everyone’s tongue he is a man on the move and ubiquitous on the fashion scene. The saying goes “a jack of all trades, master
of none” but what happens when he is the master of all trades? He is at once
photographer, curator, critic, writer, historian, diarist, judge and always
dealing with fashion in its broadest sense. He might be a wunderkind of fashion
who envelops and absorbs all that he encounters. It is safe to assume that
Motwary has never met a task he couldn’t handle or master and in this business
that’s the perfecta!
This
interview precedes the U.S. release of his first book based on his first
curated museum exhibit, both of the same name, Haute-à-Porter. In this young man’s life he has accomplished and
been credited with so much more than most in this realm where knowledge and intelligence are the rarity rather than
rule. It was my pleasure to pin him down and have him tell us who he is and
what he does and what’s on his mind so with that, here is Filep Motwary in his
own words:
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
Jeffrey Felner: First tell us a little about how you
“arrived” at the present. What brought you to this point?
Filep
Motwary: my resume as follows …
He started off his career
assisting as a stylist for the Greek editions of L’Officiel and Vogue.
For four years he worked as head
designer at the Athenian atelier Loukia for the haute couture and prêt-a-porter
collections before moving to Paris to work for designers like John Galliano,
Christian Dior and Chloe in mid-2000.
Motwary continues to create costumes for bespoke projects alone or in collaboration with jewelry designer Maria Mastori with whom they worked together on six pret-a-porter collections, from 2006 to 2010. His costumes have been presented in several of museums, including Modemuseum Hasselt in Belgium,Atopos, La Gaite Lyrique in Paris, Centraal Museum Utrecht in The Netherlands, Musée d’Art et d’Histoire de Saint-Brieuc in Brittany France.
Motwary continues to create costumes for bespoke projects alone or in collaboration with jewelry designer Maria Mastori with whom they worked together on six pret-a-porter collections, from 2006 to 2010. His costumes have been presented in several of museums, including Modemuseum Hasselt in Belgium,Atopos, La Gaite Lyrique in Paris, Centraal Museum Utrecht in The Netherlands, Musée d’Art et d’Histoire de Saint-Brieuc in Brittany France.
As a visual journalist, he
collaborates with the digital Joyce.com in Hong Kong since 2011; He
photographed projects for Giambattista Valli, Christian Louboutin, Vogue.fr,
Vogue.it, New Yorker’s THE CUT, Boycott, Harper’s Bazaar, Wmagazine, Totem,
Kenzo, Chloe, Sacai, Mercedes Benz, and TheStimuleye among others.
Between 2011to 2015 he collaborated closely with the founder and director of the Villa Noailles and Hyères Festival, Jean Pierre Blanc.
Between 2011to 2015 he collaborated closely with the founder and director of the Villa Noailles and Hyères Festival, Jean Pierre Blanc.
From 2005 to 2015, Motwary
was the founder of Un nouVeau iDEAL which was included in “The World’s Top
Fashion Blogs” book, edited by Susie Bubble and William Oliver, published by
PRESTEL (2011).
In February 2014, Motwary was
invited by Premiere Vision and Zoom by Fatex to exhibit a series of large-scale
photographs as a solo show, titled “STREET IT BOYZ”.
Motwary is the curator of educational event FASHION ON SCREEN, a short films festival presented in Athens organized by Fashion Workshop, counting its second edition in spring 2015.
Motwary is the curator of educational event FASHION ON SCREEN, a short films festival presented in Athens organized by Fashion Workshop, counting its second edition in spring 2015.
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: What was your most favorite
assignment? Collaboration? Project?
FM: I take assignments that I like. It’s rare I do
something under pressure, very rare, but I enjoy working with teams as much as
I enjoy working by myself. I love my photo projects with Christian Louboutin
for example or when I interview a personality that I have great respect for.
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: If you could invite any 5 people
to dinner who would they be and why?
FM: Irene Silvani would be the first; I enjoy our
conversations so much. Then it would be Henry Miller, my favorite author to
bring his immaculate eroticism and stories, model Guinevere Van Seenus because
she always keeps my interest stimulated and I know nothing about her except
that every time I see her on a photo I get the goosebumps, Helmut Newton because
he was Helmut Newton, the photographer. Lastly, I would invite Liz Taylor and
she would arrive dressed as Cleopatra.
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: Now, the book! Let’s talk about
how the book came about and why the book came about?
FM: In 2012, I decided to start working on a project that
aimed to put down a possible justification of where prêt a porter and haute
couture cross paths.
For two
years I was collecting visuals and placing them in thematic folders and
categories while filling up my notebooks with ideas, photos I had taken while
being backstage at the major shows, opinions I would hear here and there, and
articles I would read online… Let’s say it was a sort of investigation for
which I hired myself to do. It soon became a full concept and then Modemuseum
Hasselt came in and allowed me to turn it to an exhibition.
Exhibitions
are usually accompanied by a catalogue but instead I wanted a book, first to
acknowledge the work of the designers that could not fit in the spaces of the
museum and also to use it as a testimony of the current fashion’s state, the
past and analyze the specific themes as presented in my project. Through 27
interviews and numerous examples of great photography and art, Haute-à-Porter
became not only an exhibition but also a book that reflects sociology, history,
psychology, theories and certain fashion terms and opinions on subjects never
discussed before in such a context. I collaborated with Lannoo, known for great
fashion publications such as Dries Van Noten, Ann Demeulemeuster Monograph,
Stephen Jones and many others…
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: What do you think of the present
state of fashion and why? What would you like to see happen?
FM: Personally, I am involved in fashion and have deep
respect for it. For 20 years I serve it from several angles. Hopefully all the
people working in this industry, no matter their position or status, do it for
the right reasons. Ideally, it would really be nice if some of the designers
gave a chance to emotion again, like they used to. Some do still but it’s not
enough.
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
Monday, June 20, 2016
ROBERT PRESUTTI photographer extraordinaire
At a time
when mediocrity and “me too” seems to be the rule rather than the exception,
those who possess great talent seem to shine even brighter. This does not mean
that their name is on the tip of everyone’s tongue nor does it mean that their
oeuvre is readily visible in the appropriate settings. What it does mean is that in today’s world, of
fashion especially, we reward the less talented and applaud those with minimal
talents rather than laud those who brim with it. The opportunities once
available and the visionaries that were
once in control have long since left this world and left us with the
ill-advised, ill equipped and uneducated
in their place who only see the most banal.
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
Robert
Presutti is a brilliant portraitist, storyteller and visual diarist of our age.
His work smarts of Avedon, Arrowsmith, Penn, Leibowitz, McCurry, Karsh, Curtis
and many more. In other words he is
part disciple and partly influenced by some of the greatest of the 20th
century and yet he is his own man with his own distinct vision. He is armed with an almost painterly skillset
as well as technical knowledge that far exceeds many of his colleagues.
Having been
the subject of one of his sittings, it occurred to me that with the most
minimal of set ups, the end result can be dazzling and exceptional rather just
another snap shot photograph that’s been photo shopped beyond the subject’s
recognition. In other words it is the
person who clicks the shutter and what he extracts from his subjects that is
the tipping point. It can be said that being chosen by an artist as subject is
not only gratifying but flattering beyond words, even for this hard ass fashion
veteran.
As you will learn
from his interview, Robert’s story is one that reads like a fictional adventure
and yet it is quite real. What will be gleaned is that this is a man with
passion. His passion is offered to you via his visual artistry and acuity which
deserve your attention as well as many others. He surely has captured mine!
www.robertpresutti.com |
| click image to enlarge |
Jeffrey Felner: Can you give us a capsule biography
of how you go to where you are today?
Robert
Presutti: In Italy at age 21 and fresh out of the army with just 2 years of high
school and no job, a friend started showing me some photo publications and it
was immediate love. I had never owned a camera nor taken a photo in my life but
next thing I know I am on an airplane flying to a foreign country, not knowing
the language and with no money. I went to Rochester because I had read that RIT
was one of the best photo schools in the world but what I didn't know is
that it was very expensive to go to school in this country. I spent 7 months
learning enough English in order to enroll at Monroe Community College, and
then 2 years later I transferred to RIT where I graduated with a BFA in
Commercial Photography. After a year back in Italy I came to NY and worked as
an assistant/lighting director with some of the best photographers/creatives;
Deborah Turbeville, Mary Ellen Mark, Brigitte Lacombe, Fabian Baron, Neil
Slavin and many more. For the past 8 years I have been working as a freelance
photographer in NYC traveling to some of the most remote corners of the world
and working for clients like the New York Times, L’Uomo Vogue, T Magazine,
Alinari, White House Black Market etc.….
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: What or who would be your dream collaboration and
why?
RP: That’s a
tough one as there are/were so many I would have liked. I never did a film
although my mind works much like a cinematographer, a film with Ingmar Bergman
would have been dream collaboration since I’ve always loved Bergman. His films are powerful, fearless, haunting and
technically perfect, especially his black and white which is my preferred
medium. He also collaborated with two of the greatest cinematographers: Gunnar
Fischer and Sven Nykvist
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: If you could invite any 5 people to dinner who would
they be and why?
RP: Leonardo
da Vinci, Saint Francis, Proust, Bach and my elementary school teacher; Da
Vinci for the genius mind and his diverse talents. Saint Francis, even though I
am not religious, for the way he loved all creation, for the way he was able to
forgive and his ability to give up everything for what he believed in. Then, Proust because he is my favorite writer.
Bach because I love music and because I think he is the master of them
all. Lastly my elementary school teacher because she is the only one that saw
behind my trouble maker behavior
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: How would you describe your “vision” and from whom or
what do you draw the most inspiration and why?
RP: My vision
is the sum of all that I love; film, art, literature and music but most of
all it’s my interest in certain people and the way I can portray their
inner being and persona. Irving Penn was my favorite photographer and
inspiration and it was in his work the subjects is always strong and dignified,
there is always a sense of intelligence and pride in his portraits
![]() |
| click image to enlarge |
JF: Let’s speak to the digital age vs. the “film” age of
photography; which is your preference and why and do you think that 21st
century technology has sullied/tarnished the art of photography and why?
RP: I prefer
film but shoot mostly digital now. Digital if used intelligently and without
abusing it can open the door to new horizons. There has been lots of talk about
how technology has tarnished the art of photography and I agree with that but
the technology is not to be blamed but how it’s used. When shooting film a
photographer, even a mediocre one, has to have a certain understanding of
lighting and technique which doesn't just happen overnight, there is a lot of
thought put in each and every frame before pushing the trigger. With the event
of digital and the ability to shoot thousands of frames we got sloppier, we
think less, pay less attention to details, shooting a lot more than needed in
the hope of the chance to get at least one great shot out of many or that post
production might enhance. All of a sudden, anyone can be a photographer or
filmmaker without going through years of training. Technology has become the
main focus leaving behind talent in its wake. Photo editors now have triple the
amount of photographers to choose from and too often the choice has little to
do with talent.
www.robertpresutti.com
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
The System is Broken .. an editorial
With many of the heritage brands being reignited as
supposedly au courant fashion, it has occurred to me that the system is indeed
quite broken. The question is if it is irreparably broken or can it be
resuscitated back to its proper purpose and that is to sell clothes.
First LVMH appointed Raf as a creative director. Whether or
not this was a wise choice, it really isn’t for me to say even though I abhor
what he stands for and what his output has been. Yearly sales at Dior, as a
brand, have risen but take note that apparel, including haute couture is not
broken out in terms of what has grown under his reign. My gripe has been if you
have a heritage that has a rich history and a huge archive, why must it be
totally reimagined rather than its history massaged and evolved as a brand for
the 21st century. I fear the next disaster waiting to happen to is
the once esteemed brand of Bill Blass.
So, now after the supposed success of Saint Laurent, we have
all sorts of assistants, fledgling and self-inflated designers being appointed
as creative directors for breathing heritage brands or just these old school fusty
names that must have been purchased for no other reason than attention or in
hope that anyone might recognize the name they just paid for. Cases in point
are Carven, Courreges, Vionnet and even Paco Rabanne; lest us forget Ungaro
which has suffered numerous disastrous designers. Yes, there have been reimaginings
that seem to work such as Balmain, Mugler and a few more but even those bear no
resemblance to what made the names great or famous… so why use these names
other than for attention? Keep in mind that just because a designer says they
have been inspired by the founder, the end results are usually that you just
shake your head from this convoluted and self-inflicted delusion.
Next up is a fawning media with the sheep mentality that
seems to only be interested in garnering ad dollars and certainly not offering
any insight or real opinions about a collection. What happened to critics who actually
understand what they look at and honestly have an authoritative voice rather
than just the regurgitation of a ludicrous press release whose words usually
belie what has been presented or even worse described in a single word like …
FABULOUS!. Fashion is not a cerebral profession, you don’t have to be a Rhodes Scholar
to design clothes but you must have talent.
Talent is the next logical topic. While the skill set is highly
individual to each designer, it is safe to say that these mega brands should
require designers to be able to sketch and drape and not just espouse enigmatic
inspirations and point. It is said that Raf would never meet with a private
client even though the house does haute couture and it is my assumption that he is either a misogynist, afraid of the
female body or has never been in a fitting a room with a female. Designers need
to be designers and not in charge of store design or advertising. There are
such HUGE disconnects within brands such as Saint Laurent and Dior. We have
Hedi’s moody trashy Helmut Newtonish photos for apparel then we have glossy Maybelline
type ads for cosmetics not to mention the disconnects within the brand
extensions such as printed lipsticks on shoes and handbags as if they were made
for H&M. Take for instance Jennifer Lawrence in a Dior handbag ad who
seems to not want to touch let alone hold or own the bag. Instead of hiring legions of
design staff, let those equipped with the proper skills direct things such as store
design and advertising and brand extensions. If fashion has become just another
arm of big business then it should be treated as such. After all, you wouldn’t
allow a bookkeeper to prepare the quarterly earnings report for LVMH, now would
you? You can’t hand over the reins of a major brand to a creative director who
has the skill set of an assistant or a vendeuse!
Having spent decades in this business, it is my opinion that
yes, fashion and retailing have changed or evolved or whatever but the facts
remain that women want to feel sexy and attractive when they spend thousands of
dollars on clothes. They do not want to look like they are dressed for
Halloween in May and even though today’s client is more body conscious, their essential
concerns remain the same as they did 40 years ago. Case in point; women of every
age, let alone women of a certain age, do not ALL want to wear sleeveless
dresses! Furthermore they are forced to in great majority as when you tour any
store, a dress with sleeves is as rare as hen’s teeth! So we can now speak to
the reality of who is your brand's demographic? Age?
Body type? Disposable income?
Or in other words the who, what and where of your supposed client. Carry
on all you want but Gucci girls who want to look like nerdy schoolgirls can’t afford
to spend $6000 on a dress and so they get their version from the thrift shops and various
fast fashion chains and the same goes for Hedi’s clients. BTW, the thrift
store, well that’s where so many of these designers get their new groundbreaking ideas.
IMHO. It is what happens at Dior that will determine the
long term fashion climate. I firmly believe that if Arnault or whomever actually
takes the bold step of hiring a seasoned designer to restore Dior to its proper place in the fashion pantheon,
then well… all the kids of fashion better be worried ... really worried.
PS ... yes … I use
Hedi and Raf as whipping posts but there are legions more who fit the bill
Labels:
Dior,
fashion,
fashion by rules,
fashion designers,
Gucci,
Hedi Slimane,
jeffrey felner,
LVMH,
milan,
New York,
PARIS,
Raf Simons,
Saint Laurent
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















