The 400 pound elephant in the room is John Galliano; as
anyone knows by now, he has been present for the design process of this 2013
fall Oscar de la Renta collection. So,
now that’ s out of the way, we can move on to what we saw here as far as how
deeply or how obviously the banished and disgraced Galliano has been involved.
From the opening salvo, first exit, you knew change was
afoot here at the house of de la Renta.
The opening exits were most definitely the product of Mr. Galliano
rather than Mr. de la Renta and as the show built, one could not help but
notice there were almost 2 different collections being shown in tandem. In my opinion, there could have been a much
smoother segue than what we saw. It
wasn’t enough that that there was a seismic shift in the overall styling, there
was also an essential element of every Oscar show that was missing... that
being that these opening styles and many
of the obviously Galliano “touched” pieces lacked the clean impeccable finish
that is a hallmark of de la Renta and certainly of Dior. To my eye there was a, at lack of a better
word, sloppiness to the pieces. I
suppose the result was intended to strike a note of softness and folds, draping
and origami effects that Galliano made famous at Dior. If that wasn’t enough, there were also the
bias cut gowns which, to me, came right out of John Galliano collections of
yore… the eponymous brand. An overall
polish seemed to absent and that is something that both designers have been
long recognized for.
The matter at hand here is what did I think of this
collection and the answer would have to be a very clear one… I am not
sure. I didn’t hate it, far from it… I
didn’t fall over foaming at the mouth rabidly in love in with it either. The question is very simply, is the baton
being passed or are we just being teased so that Mr. Galliano’s return is not
quite as shocking as it might be. Since
Ms. Wintour orchestrated this scenario, we do know this … these clothes will be
heavily featured on the pages of Vogue come September and my guess is that the
exposure is the quid pro quo for Galliano’s refuge at Oscar. There were pieces that were unmistakably
Oscar whether ball gown or daywear and likewise for Galliano. There were clothes that were, for me, just
silliness, clothes that were indicative of the 21st century brand
Oscar de la Renta and then clothes which “had no home.”
Aspects that were very blatant, even though they were
adjunct to the clothes, would have be those pertaining to the styling. From the makeup, the hats, shoe colors, the
hair,the jewelry and the layering of gloves, they all seem to smart of Galliano rather than Oscar but my
question that remains is “would just those flourishes have worked if the entire
collection was designed by Oscar and his studio or did it have to be a joint
effort?” Time will explain a lot of this
as well as when and if Mr. Galliano assumes a literally more visible presence
at the brand.
I would love to know what you think , but I caution you , do
not opine based on emotion, dispense your opinion with intelligence and
thought about what you have seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment